Policy on Engagement

---

Operating Principle

“Covenant over compliance, yet compliance for covenant.”

Meaning—you follow regulatory law not because it grants you legitimacy, but because lawful order is part of divine order. This lets your sovereign framework coexist peacefully with national and global systems

Policy Framework for Mutual Engagement with the State of Loc Nation

This policy paper is issued in the interest of public safety, lawful cooperation, and institutional trust between the State of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Corporation and all external institutions, including government bodies, academic organizations, financial systems, media outlets, and community partners.
 

Includes Procedural grievances, evidence, solutions and prayer for remedy of community mass class action for the victim descendants, of the illegal transatlantic slave trade

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZT877nbAw/

In the landmark case of Clement vs. Garland (Civil No: 1:24-cv-00479-RC), a pivotal development occurred on May 28, 2024, when the presiding judge granted "leave to file" for a series of admissible testimonials from the State of Loc Nation. These testimonials are critical to supporting the claims made by Presidential Candidate Rev. Dr. Christina Clement.

Overview of the Submitted Testimonials

The testimonials submitted encompass over 100 statements from individuals belonging to the State of Loc Nation. These statements were meticulously gathered and verified for their authenticity and relevance to the case, providing a comprehensive account of the experiences and challenges faced by members of this community. The testimonials were officially submitted to the court electronically on May 27, 2024, at 8:43 AM, with a follow-up email on May 29, 2024, at 4:19 PM.

Content and Relevance

1.Personal Narratives: The testimonials include personal narratives that detail instances of systemic discrimination, violation of constitutional rights, and the impact of federal and local policies on the lives of individuals within the State of Loc Nation. These narratives are crucial in illustrating the broader socio-political context that underpins Dr. Clement's claims.

2. Expert Statements: Included among the testimonials are statements from experts in law, sociology, and human rights. These experts provide professional insights and analyses that support the legal arguments presented in the case. Their expertise lends significant weight to the claims of constitutional and statutory violations.

3. Community Impact: Many testimonials focus on the collective impact of governmental actions on the State of Loc Nation. They highlight issues such as economic disenfranchisement, inadequate representation, and cultural erosion, thereby reinforcing the necessity for the relief sought by Dr. Clement.

Legal and Procedural Significance

The judge's decision to grant "leave to file" for these testimonials signifies a recognition of their potential importance in establishing the factual and legal foundation of the case. By allowing these documents to be formally entered into the record, the court acknowledges their relevance and admissibility under the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Implications for the Case

1.Strengthening the Plaintiff's Position: The admissible testimonials bolster Dr. Clement's position by providing substantive evidence of the claims made in the complaint. They serve to corroborate her allegations and highlight the systemic issues at play.

2. Influencing Judicial Review: These testimonials will be a key factor in the judge's review of the motion for summary judgment. The undisputed nature of the facts presented through these testimonials could significantly impact the court's decision, potentially leading to a favorable judgment for Dr. Clement.

3. Public and Media Attention: The inclusion of these testimonials brings a human element to the legal proceedings, likely attracting public and media attention. This can amplify the visibility of the issues at hand and galvanize broader support for Dr. Clement's advocacy efforts.

Conclusion

The admissible State of Loc Nation testimonials submitted in the case of Clement vs. Garland represent a critical component of the plaintiff's evidence. With the judge granting "leave to file" on May 28, 2024, these testimonials are now officially part of the court record, providing a compelling and multifaceted portrayal of the injustices faced by the community. This development marks a significant step forward in Rev Dr. Christina Clement's pursuit of justice and constitutional reform.

State of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Corporation (SoLN GPBC)

Imperial Proclamation of International Recognition, Enforcement, and Dovone Hyperpower Authority

This record documents the perfected filings and proclamations of the State of Loc Nation Global Public Benefit Corporation (SoLN GPBC), founded and represented by Rev. Dr. Christina Clement (HH Empress Queen Christina Clement).

Through court filings, UCC registrations, affidavits of publication, and United Nations acknowledgment, SoLN GPBC establishes its sovereign authority as the Divine Hyperpower (State of Loc Nation GPBC) correcting the Superpower (the United States of America).

Included Records:

• U.S. District Court (Case No. 1:24-cv-00479-RC)

• U.S. Court of Appeals (Case No. 24-5263)

• U.S. District Court Miscellaneous Docket (Case No. 25mc78)

• Georgia Superior Court UCC Filing (No. 044-2025-002376)

• Affidavit of Publication, Brooklyn Daily Eagle (May 30, 2025)

• Submissions to the United Nations Department of Global Communications

• Submissions to FASAB and IPSASB for recognition of the Loc Nation Dollar (LND)

Et al 

Legal Effect:

• All notified governments and agencies failed to rebut within the lawful period.

• By UCC §§1-201, 2-207, 3-604, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, acceptance is perfected by default.

Authority Declared:

SoLN GPBC exercises executive, legislative, judicial, and treasury powers as an independent sovereign entity. It is established as the Divine Hyperpower over the Superpower binding at municipal, state, federal, and international levels.